Blog

DiffExplain læser enhver git diff og forklarer, hvad der er ændret, og hvorfor, markerer risikoområder til gennemsyn og udkaster en PR…

DiffExplain reads only the git diff you paste. It drafts a plain-English reading, a short risk note, and a PR description for a reviewer, a PM, or a junior. It does not clone a repository, open a pull request, or commit.

Typisk forløb: 3 gennemgåbare trin (input → generering → gennemsyn). Ingen opdigtede brugertal.

Hvad inkluderer DiffExplain ved første øjekast?

  • A reading of the diff you paste
  • Risk words called out if they appear
  • A PR description for the reader you pick
  • Does not open a repo or commit

Sådan bruger du DiffExplain?

  1. 1. Paste the diff

    Paste a git diff. DiffExplain does not open a repository.

  2. 2. Read the draft

    A reading of the lines, a risk note if risk words appear, and a PR description for the reader you pick.

  3. 3. Copy it yourself

    Nothing is committed. You paste the draft into your own pull request.

Hvad spørger folk om DiffExplain?

What does DiffExplain do?

It drafts a reading of a git diff you paste, plus a PR description for the reader you pick.

Who is the PR description for?

You pick a code reviewer, a PM, or a junior. The wording changes. You still edit it.

Does it flag risky changes?

A checklist may mark words such as auth, migration, or password if they appear in the paste. That is not a bug finder.

Which repos or languages?

There is no repository connection. Any text diff you paste can be read. The product does not clone a repo.

Does it push to my repo?

No. It returns text. It does not open a pull request or commit.

Which countries and regions can I use DiffExplain in?

As a cloud web app it is reachable from any country with internet access; there is no region lock by default.

Is my code private?

Your diff is used only to produce the explanation and is not sold. Details are on our Privacy page.

What languages does it support?

Interface and reports are in English; diffs in other languages are explained where the underlying model understands them.

Was this result helpful?Detailed feedback